Saṁyutta Nikāya 12.25 3.

Bhūmijasutta

Dasabalavagga Bhūmijasutta Sāvatthiyaṁ viharati.

He was staying at Sāvatthī.

Atha kho āyasmā bhūmijo sāyanhasamayaṁ paṭisallānā vuṭṭhito yenāyasmā sāriputto tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā āyasmatā sāriputtena saddhiṁ sammodi. Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi.

Then, in the late afternoon, Venerable Bhūmija came out of retreat and went to Venerable Sāriputta. He exchanged greetings with Venerable Sāriputta and, after their pleasantries, sat down to one side.

Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho āyasmā bhūmijo āyasmantaṁ sāriputtaṁ etadavoca: “Santāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti.

Sitting to one side, Venerable Bhūmija said to Venerable Sāriputta: Venerable Sāriputta, there are some ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as created by oneself.

Santi panāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā paraṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as created by another.

Santāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkatañca paraṅkatañca sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as created both by oneself and by another.

Santi panāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as neither created by oneself nor by another, but as arising by chance.

Idha no, āvuso sāriputta, bhagavā kiṁvādī kimakkhāyī, kathaṁ byākaramānā ca mayaṁ vuttavādino ceva bhagavato assāma, na ca bhagavantaṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyyāma, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyyāma, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyyā”ti?

In this case, Venerable Sāriputta, what does the Blessed One say? How should we answer so that we would be repeating what the Blessed One has said, and not misrepresent him with what is unfactual, answering in line with the teaching, so that no fellow follower of the teaching would have grounds for criticizing us?

“Paṭiccasamuppannaṁ kho, āvuso, sukhadukkhaṁ vuttaṁ bhagavatā.

Venerable, the Blessed One has said that pleasure and pain are dependently originated.

Kiṁ paṭicca?

Dependent on what?

Phassaṁ paṭicca.

Dependent on contact.

So, saying this, you would be repeating what the Blessed One has said, and not misrepresenting him with what is unfactual, answering in line with the teaching, so that no fellow follower of the teaching would have grounds for criticizing you.

Iti vadaṁ vuttavādī ceva bhagavato assa, na ca bhagavantaṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyya, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyya, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyya. Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe…

In this case, Venerable, those ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as created by oneself, that too is dependent on contact. And those who explain pleasure and pain as created by another, that too is dependent on contact. And those who explain pleasure and pain as created both by oneself and by another, that too is dependent on contact.

yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, tadapi phassapaccayā.

And those who explain pleasure and pain as neither created by oneself nor by another, but as arising by chance, that too is dependent on contact.

Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati.

In this case, Venerable, those ascetics and brahmins who are proponents of karma, who explain pleasure and pain as created by oneself, it is not possible that they experience that without contact.

Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe… yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjatī”ti.

And those who explain pleasure and pain as created by another, it is not possible that they experience that without contact. And those who explain pleasure and pain as created both by oneself and by another, it is not possible that they experience that without contact.

And those who explain pleasure and pain as neither created by oneself nor by another, but as arising by chance, it is not possible that they experience that without contact.

Assosi kho āyasmā ānando āyasmato sāriputtassa āyasmatā bhūmijena saddhiṁ imaṁ kathāsallāpaṁ.

Venerable Ānanda heard this conversation between Venerable Sāriputta and Venerable Bhūmija.

Atha kho āyasmā ānando yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi.

Then, the Venerable Ānanda approached the Blessed One; having approached and paid homage to the Blessed One, he sat down to one side.

Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho āyasmā ānando yāvatako āyasmato sāriputtassa āyasmatā bhūmijena saddhiṁ ahosi kathāsallāpo taṁ sabbaṁ bhagavato ārocesi.

While sitting to one side, the Venerable Ānanda reported to the Blessed One the entire conversation that had taken place between the Venerable Sāriputta and the Venerable Bhūmija.

“Sādhu sādhu, ānanda, yathā taṁ sāriputto sammā byākaramāno byākareyya.

Good, good, Ānanda, that Sāriputta would explain it correctly.

Paṭiccasamuppannaṁ kho, ānanda, sukhadukkhaṁ vuttaṁ mayā.

Conditioned by contact, Ānanda, is pleasure and pain, as I have said.

Kiṁ paṭicca?

On what condition?

Phassaṁ paṭicca.

On the condition of contact.

Iti vadaṁ vuttavādī ceva me assa, na ca maṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyya, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyya, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyya.

Thus, saying this, I would be speaking rightly, and I would not be misrepresenting the truth, and I would be explaining in accordance with the Dhamma, and no one who is a fellow practitioner would find grounds for reproach.

Tatrānanda, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā.

There, Ānanda, those ascetics and brahmins who declare that pleasure and pain are self-made, even that is conditioned by contact.

Yepi te …pe…

And those...

yepi te …pe…

And those...

yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā.

And those ascetics and brahmins who declare that pleasure and pain are other-made, even that is conditioned by contact.

Tatrānanda, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati.

There, Ānanda, those ascetics and brahmins who declare that pleasure and pain are self-made, they would not experience it apart from contact; that is not possible.

Yepi te …pe…

And those...

yepi te …pe…

And those...

yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati.

And those ascetics and brahmins who declare that pleasure and pain are other-made, they would not experience it apart from contact; that is not possible.

Kāye vā hānanda, sati kāyasañcetanāhetu uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

In the body, Ānanda, when there is bodily volition, internal pleasure and pain arise.

Vācāya vā hānanda, sati vacīsañcetanāhetu uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

In speech, Ānanda, when there is verbal volition, internal pleasure and pain arise.

Mane vā hānanda, sati manosañcetanāhetu uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ avijjāpaccayā ca.

In the mind, Ānanda, when there is mental volition, internal pleasure and pain arise, conditioned by ignorance.

Sāmaṁ vā taṁ, ānanda, kāyasaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti, yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether one, Ānanda, generates bodily formations oneself, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Pare vā taṁ, ānanda, kāyasaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharonti, yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Or others, Ānanda, generate bodily formations, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Sampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda, kāyasaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether one, Ānanda, generates bodily formations knowingly, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Asampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda, kāyasaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Or unknowingly, Ānanda, generates bodily formations, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Sāmaṁ vā taṁ, ānanda, vacīsaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether one, Ānanda, generates verbal formations oneself, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Pare vā taṁ, ānanda, vacīsaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharonti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Or others, Ānanda, generate verbal formations, due to which internal pleasure and pain arise.

Sampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda …pe… asampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda, vacīsaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether aware or not, Ānanda, one constructs verbal formations, which, depending on the conditions, give rise to internal pleasure and pain.

Sāmaṁ vā taṁ, ānanda, manosaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether oneself, Ānanda, constructs mental formations, which, depending on the conditions, give rise to internal pleasure and pain.

Pare vā taṁ, ānanda, manosaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharonti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Or others, Ānanda, construct mental formations, which, depending on the conditions, give rise to internal pleasure and pain.

Sampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda …pe… asampajāno vā taṁ, ānanda, manosaṅkhāraṁ abhisaṅkharoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

Whether aware or not, Ānanda, one constructs mental formations, which, depending on the conditions, give rise to internal pleasure and pain.

Imesu, ānanda, dhammesu avijjā anupatitā.

In these matters, Ānanda, ignorance is involved.

Avijjāya tveva, ānanda, asesavirāganirodhā so kāyo na hoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

With the complete fading away and cessation of ignorance, Ānanda, that body does not exist, which, depending on the conditions, gives rise to internal pleasure and pain.

Sā vācā na hoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ.

That speech does not exist, which, depending on the conditions, gives rise to internal pleasure and pain.

So mano na hoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhaṁ. Khettaṁ taṁ na hoti …pe…

That mind does not exist, which, depending on the conditions, gives rise to internal pleasure and pain.

vatthu taṁ na hoti …pe… āyatanaṁ taṁ na hoti …pe… adhikaraṇaṁ taṁ na hoti yaṁpaccayāssa taṁ uppajjati ajjhattaṁ sukhadukkhan”ti. Pañcamaṁ.

That field does not exist, that base does not exist, that sense sphere does not exist, that foundation does not exist, which, depending on the conditions, gives rise to internal pleasure and pain.